<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A variety of things</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chriswalley.net/2009/11/06/variety-of-things/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chriswalley.net/2009/11/06/variety-of-things/</link>
	<description>Author, geologist and teacher: official website and blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 23:22:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kirsty</title>
		<link>http://www.chriswalley.net/2009/11/06/variety-of-things/comment-page-1/#comment-703</link>
		<dc:creator>kirsty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 00:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chriswalley.net/?p=342#comment-703</guid>
		<description>Also perhaps a &#039;useful&#039; shibboleth - &quot;You believe in an old earth - you&#039;re a bit dodgy.&quot;, or, alternatively, &quot;You believe in a young earth - you&#039;re just a naïve fundamentalist.&quot; 

Which is not, of course, how we should be relating to each other. But so easy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also perhaps a &#8216;useful&#8217; shibboleth &#8211; &#8220;You believe in an old earth &#8211; you&#8217;re a bit dodgy.&#8221;, or, alternatively, &#8220;You believe in a young earth &#8211; you&#8217;re just a naïve fundamentalist.&#8221; </p>
<p>Which is not, of course, how we should be relating to each other. But so easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boaz</title>
		<link>http://www.chriswalley.net/2009/11/06/variety-of-things/comment-page-1/#comment-696</link>
		<dc:creator>Boaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chriswalley.net/?p=342#comment-696</guid>
		<description>Hello, Dr. Walley.

I&#039;m not sure why you would be perturbed about the questions, since there are a lot of people that could construct a logic chain where if the universe came into being in a fashion other than outlined in Genesis (even (or especially) ignoring time, just considering order), then God seems to have lied, and is no longer perfectly good.  So an argument straight out of philosophy, logic, and theology, but that has profound implications in those fields:  do you really want to follow a God that is not perfect?  What would the nature of the afterlife be under such a deity, assuming that such an afterlife exists?

Boaz, pondering provocative questions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, Dr. Walley.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure why you would be perturbed about the questions, since there are a lot of people that could construct a logic chain where if the universe came into being in a fashion other than outlined in Genesis (even (or especially) ignoring time, just considering order), then God seems to have lied, and is no longer perfectly good.  So an argument straight out of philosophy, logic, and theology, but that has profound implications in those fields:  do you really want to follow a God that is not perfect?  What would the nature of the afterlife be under such a deity, assuming that such an afterlife exists?</p>
<p>Boaz, pondering provocative questions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
